Are We Becoming More Moral Faster Than We’re Becoming More Dangerous? From Crypto-Gram

Posted by | International Crime | 0 |

The following is from an article by

Bruce Schneier

Are We Becoming More Moral Faster Than We’re Becoming More

In “The Better Angels of Our Nature,” Steven Pinker convincingly makes the point that by pretty much every measure you can think of, violence has declined on our planet over the long term. More generally, “the world continues to improve in just about every way.” He’s right, but there are two important caveats.

One, he is talking about the long term. The trend lines are uniformly positive across the centuries and mostly positive across the decades, but go up and down year to year. While this is an important development for our species, most of us care about changes year to year — and we can’t make any predictions about whether this year will be better or worse than last year in any individual measurement.

The second caveat is both more subtle and more important. In 2013, I wrote about how technology empowers attackers. By this measure, the world is getting more dangerous:

Because the damage attackers can cause becomes greater as
technology becomes more powerful. Guns become more harmful,
explosions become bigger, malware becomes more pernicious…
and so on. A single attacker, or small group of attackers, can
cause more destruction than ever before.

This is exactly why the whole post-9/11
weapons-of-mass-destruction debate was so overwrought:
Terrorists are scary, terrorists flying airplanes into
buildings are even scarier, and the thought of a terrorist with
a nuclear bomb is absolutely terrifying.

Pinker’s trends are based both on increased societal morality and better technology, and both are based on averages: the average person with the average technology. My increased attack capability trend is based on those two trends as well, but on the outliers: the most extreme person with the most extreme technology. Pinker’s trends are noisy, but over the long term they’re strongly linear. Mine seem to be exponential.

When Pinker expresses optimism that the overall trends he identifies will continue into the future, he’s making a bet. He’s betting that his trend lines and my trend lines won’t cross. That is, that our society’s gradual improvement in overall morality will continue to outpace the potentially exponentially increasing ability of the extreme few to destroy everything. I am less optimistic:

But the problem isn’t that these security measures won’t work
— even as they shred our freedoms and liberties — it’s that
no security is perfect.

Because sooner or later, the technology will exist for a
hobbyist to explode a nuclear weapon, print a lethal virus from
a bio-printer, or turn our electronic infrastructure into a
vehicle for large-scale murder. We’ll have the technology
eventually to annihilate ourselves in great numbers, and
sometime after, that technology will become cheap enough to be

As it gets easier for one member of a group to destroy the
entire group, and the group size gets larger, the odds of
someone in the group doing it approaches certainty. Our global
interconnectedness means that our group size encompasses
everyone on the planet, and since government hasn’t kept up, we
have to worry about the weakest-controlled member of the
weakest-controlled country. Is this a fundamental limitation of
technological advancement, one that could end civilization?
First our fears grip us so strongly that, thinking about the
short term, we willingly embrace a police state in a desperate
attempt to keep us safe; then, someone goes off and destroys us

Clearly we’re not at the point yet where any of these disaster scenarios have come to pass, and Pinker rightly expresses skepticism when he says that historical doomsday scenarios have so far never come to pass. But that’s the thing about exponential curves; it’s hard to predict the future from the past. So either I have discovered a fundamental problem with any intelligent individualistic species and have therefore explained the Fermi Paradox, or there is some other factor in play that will ensure that the two trend lines won’t cross.

Pinker’s book: “The Better Angels of Our Nature”:

A Q&A with Pinker on current events:

My essay: